Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What Movies Have You Seen Lately?
Zero Dark Thirty--I was originally reluctant to see it because of the beginning where they play actual calls from the 9/11 attack--a little gruesome and manipulative for me, but it was done over black screen and so jumbled you could only make out a couple of distinct voices. Those were heartbreaking. Quickly moving onto torture scenes which weren't tasteful, but not as bad as I was lead to believe. Having lived through the time and followed the public story it was difficult to watch the various terrorist attacks (I always knew who was going to die.) The attack on Bin Laden's compound was nail biting. Altogether, glad I saw it, but it's not for the squeamish.
- DianeL
- Bibliophile
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: May 2011
- Location: Midatlantic east coast, United States
- Contact:
[quote=""Ash""]How is his story so different from any other movie plot? He made mistakes, progress makes his job obselete, and he has no more choices. Someone who loves him helps him find his way.
Is your anger at the movie makers for even making the movie? Or at the writer? Or the character of a (fictional) story?
I dunno, I found it to be an excellent piece of entertainment, much more so than most anything out there right now. But then I have been a fan of silent movies since I can remember and so they could have done much that I would have gladly approved of. I was tickled pink that this movie got so much grassroots approval, and that it won the Oscar! So I am a bit biased. That being said, I have had my own quibbles with some Best Picture choices, so there we are. We all have our opinions. Just not sure what you are so angry about.[/quote]
Calling it anger overstates the case exponentially. Holding an opinion unlike your own doesn't make me your adversary.
I'm a fan of silents as well, and many other types of movies and entertainment. In my case that doen't mean all silents are inviolate and wonderful. This particular movie does not charm me, for reasons I've stated pretty clearly. Considering some of its themes I found it depressing that nobody has viewed it critically. The fact that disliking this film's ideas is cause for antagonism doesn't negate its problems, which aren't all emotional in substance. The aforementioned feeling that the filmmakers were "in the room" so to speak as I watched was as much of a problem as the unlikeable (fictional, thank you so much for pointing that out) main character. (Edited to add - by the way, progress did not make Valentin's job obsolete; he simply refused to change when his industry did. That was explicit even before the problems arose. While it is everyone's right to stand even strategically weak ground, it's not their right to expect sympathy for difficulties their own choices create.)
Is your anger at the movie makers for even making the movie? Or at the writer? Or the character of a (fictional) story?
I dunno, I found it to be an excellent piece of entertainment, much more so than most anything out there right now. But then I have been a fan of silent movies since I can remember and so they could have done much that I would have gladly approved of. I was tickled pink that this movie got so much grassroots approval, and that it won the Oscar! So I am a bit biased. That being said, I have had my own quibbles with some Best Picture choices, so there we are. We all have our opinions. Just not sure what you are so angry about.[/quote]
Calling it anger overstates the case exponentially. Holding an opinion unlike your own doesn't make me your adversary.
I'm a fan of silents as well, and many other types of movies and entertainment. In my case that doen't mean all silents are inviolate and wonderful. This particular movie does not charm me, for reasons I've stated pretty clearly. Considering some of its themes I found it depressing that nobody has viewed it critically. The fact that disliking this film's ideas is cause for antagonism doesn't negate its problems, which aren't all emotional in substance. The aforementioned feeling that the filmmakers were "in the room" so to speak as I watched was as much of a problem as the unlikeable (fictional, thank you so much for pointing that out) main character. (Edited to add - by the way, progress did not make Valentin's job obsolete; he simply refused to change when his industry did. That was explicit even before the problems arose. While it is everyone's right to stand even strategically weak ground, it's not their right to expect sympathy for difficulties their own choices create.)
Last edited by DianeL on Tue January 29th, 2013, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
"To be the queen, she agreed to be the widow!"
***
The pre-modern world was willing to attribute charisma to women well before it was willing to attribute sustained rationality to them.
---Medieval Kingship, Henry A. Myers
***
http://dianelmajor.blogspot.com/
I'm a Twit: @DianeLMajor
***
The pre-modern world was willing to attribute charisma to women well before it was willing to attribute sustained rationality to them.
---Medieval Kingship, Henry A. Myers
***
http://dianelmajor.blogspot.com/
I'm a Twit: @DianeLMajor
- princess garnet
- Bibliophile
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Maryland
- Vanessa
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: August 2008
- Currently reading: The Farm at the Edge of the World by Sarah Vaughan
- Interest in HF: The first historical novel I read was Katherine by Anya Seton and this sparked off my interest in this genre.
- Favourite HF book: Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell!
- Preferred HF: Any
- Location: North Yorkshire, UK
We watched Dredd last night. My husband enjoys that sort of thing. It was OK but not my bag really! We watched The Last Samurai the night before and I preferred that, but hubby thought it was just about TC making himself look great. It probably was but I still preferred it!
currently reading: My Books on Goodreads
Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you ~ The Shadow of the Wind
Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you ~ The Shadow of the Wind
- Nefret
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 2990
- Joined: February 2009
- Favourite HF book: Welsh Princes trilogy
- Preferred HF: The Middle Ages (England), New Kingdom Egypt, Medieval France
- Location: Temple of Isis
Mansfield Park (1999), maybe I should have read the book first.
Into battle we ride with Gods by our side
We are strong and not afraid to die
We have an urge to kill and our lust for blood has to be fulfilled
WE´LL FIGHT TILL THE END! And send our enemies straight to Hell!
- "Into Battle"
{Ensiferum}
We are strong and not afraid to die
We have an urge to kill and our lust for blood has to be fulfilled
WE´LL FIGHT TILL THE END! And send our enemies straight to Hell!
- "Into Battle"
{Ensiferum}
Charlotte Grey last night, saved for ages on my Sky Box. Really enjoyed it.
Les proz e les vassals
Souvent entre piez de chevals
Kar ja li coard nI chasront
'The Brave and the valiant
Are always to be found between the hooves of horses
For never will cowards fall down there.'
Histoire de Guillaume le Mareschal
www.elizabethchadwick.com
Souvent entre piez de chevals
Kar ja li coard nI chasront
'The Brave and the valiant
Are always to be found between the hooves of horses
For never will cowards fall down there.'
Histoire de Guillaume le Mareschal
www.elizabethchadwick.com
- princess garnet
- Bibliophile
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Maryland