Post
by Ash » Sat October 25th, 2008, 3:01 pm
No question. Because of him, whole branches of my family on both sides were massacred in Poland and The Ukraine. My grandmother was in constant mourning, my elderly cousin forever guilt ridden for escaping. Whole communities destroyed, looted. Yes, he was an influence certainly. As were Mao, Stalin, and any other mass murderer. They can't help but be an influence.
Interesting question tho - how do we define 'influence'? When I see questions like the thread header, I immediately think positive. Then I remember that Times called Hitler "man of the year', because based on how they defined it, he was the man who affected the events of the world that year, not that he was a good man by any means.