
For now, I will leave the author's name out of the discussion. The book in question is a contemporary mystery and up to this point I have enjoyed every book written in this series. This book, however, has proven to be a struggle at best.
It's as though the author has two plot lines going simultaneously. One featuring the crime itself and the effort to solve it by the main players, as per usual, while the other seems to be an ongoing plot line of the individual I'm assuming will turn out to be the one who "dunit". There are typically several chapters written focusing on the main plot of the book and followed by several of the other variety. It's when I hit those "other" chapters that I feel like I am going from a nice sail down the river to a sail through an ocean of molasses. The "other" chapters do nothing for me and while I understand the author is using them to give a lot of back-story to the reader, I don't think it's wholly necessary. After reading the bit I did during my lunch hour today, I also believe the author is using these "other" chapters to rant (in a manner of speaking) about a social issue that she feels passionate about. While I was emotionally moved by what I read today, I fail to see what it has to do with the plot of the story. I have since decided to skip the remaining "other" chapters and just read those that stick with the plot as it is.
Have any of you ever experienced this before?