Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Julia Quinn - The Duke and I

Lenka
Scribbler
Posts: 6
Joined: April 2012

Julia Quinn - The Duke and I

Post by Lenka » Sun November 18th, 2012, 2:22 pm

Hello,
I would like to ask for help with some lines from this book, because I´m translating it to my mother language - Slovak.

So can somebody help me with the meaning of wickedly droll when you talk about sense of humor? :confused:

Thanks

User avatar
Vanessa
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 4155
Joined: August 2008
Currently reading: The Catherine Howard Conspiracy by Alexandra Walsh
Interest in HF: The first historical novel I read was Katherine by Anya Seton and this sparked off my interest in this genre.
Favourite HF book: Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell!
Preferred HF: Any
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Post by Vanessa » Sun November 18th, 2012, 4:04 pm

I would say it means being mischievously witty - to say something amusing with a glint in your eye!
currently reading: My Books on Goodreads

Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you ~ The Shadow of the Wind

User avatar
Misfit
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 9581
Joined: August 2008
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Misfit » Sun November 18th, 2012, 4:33 pm

[quote=""Vanessa""]I would say it means being mischievously witty - to say something amusing with a glint in your eye![/quote]

I agree. Dry wit with a healthy dose of sarcasm?
At home with a good book and the cat...
...is the only place I want to be

annis
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 4585
Joined: August 2008

Post by annis » Mon November 19th, 2012, 8:33 am

Wickedly droll = Roguish ironic wit

Slightly off the subject, but I'm irresistably reminded of Peter Mountford's funny story about how he ended up helping a Russian guy translate Mountford's own pirated book:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... ok/309105/

Lenka
Scribbler
Posts: 6
Joined: April 2012

Translating

Post by Lenka » Mon November 19th, 2012, 3:45 pm

Thanks for sharing that story about Peter. :) I´m the owner of a small publishing company and also a translator who reads this kind of books :) that ´s why I set it. I was really happy when I obtained the rights for Slovakia. It took me 4 months to sign contract - not beacuse of me but because of the literary agency and agents of Julia Quinn. Sometimes I really have the feeling that I would like to write an e-mail to JQ but I don´t want to burden her with this.

That´s why I thank you for your help :) and also for your future help.

Lenka
Scribbler
Posts: 6
Joined: April 2012

translation

Post by Lenka » Mon January 7th, 2013, 2:25 pm

Could somebody please explain to me the meaning of : Ambitious mamas were nudging their daughters and pointing to the two Bridgerton brothers, off by themselves with no company save for their sister.. I haven´t the faintest idea...and I don´t want to leave it out.

Thanks for help. :)

User avatar
Lisa
Bibliophile
Posts: 1153
Joined: August 2012
Favourite HF book: Here Be Dragons by Sharon Kay Penman
Preferred HF: Any time period/location. Timeslip, usually prefer female POV. Also love Gothic melodrama.
Location: Northeast Scotland

Post by Lisa » Mon January 7th, 2013, 2:37 pm

[quote=""Lenka""]Ambitious mamas were nudging their daughters and pointing to the two Bridgerton brothers, off by themselves with no company save for their sister.. [/quote]

Hi! I haven't read the book, so this is assuming that the scene here is a gathering of people (a reception/dance or something like that) and the bold text is referring to the Bridgerton brothers.

It would mean that the brothers were probably slightly apart from the rest of the crowd ("off by themselves"), and the only person accompanying them was their sister ("save for" meaning "except for").

However, depending on the context, "off by themselves" could also just mean the brothers are usually escorted or protected in some way, but on this occasion they aren't (apart from by their sister, who apparently won't get in the way of the "ambitious mamas"). It should hopefully be easy to tell which meaning is correct though, knowing the rest of the book!

User avatar
MLE (Emily Cotton)
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 3552
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
Favourite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
Location: California Bay Area

Post by MLE (Emily Cotton) » Mon January 7th, 2013, 3:21 pm

In context, the clause refers to the fact that two brothers (one or both a very good catch, as inferred by the adjective 'ambitious' added to mamas) haven't yet been 'claimed' by any of the daughters (as inferred by the fact that the only woman with them is their sister, who, of course, is not going to marry either).

Lenka
Scribbler
Posts: 6
Joined: April 2012

Post by Lenka » Mon January 7th, 2013, 3:30 pm

The sister was hiding from a suitor. She was standing alone in the corner of a ballroom but her brothers noticed her and came to her to talk. And because they were attractive, mothers of unmarried young ladies were pointing at them and sending their daughters to talk to them. And because brothers were the aim of unmarried girls who were also the aim of the sister´s suitor, the suitor would finally find the sister.

Could I translate the meaning : Ambitious mamas were nudging their daughters and pointing to the two Bridgerton brothers, off by themselves with no company save for their sister..that they were standing there alone except for their sister?

Or were they her save? Or their company was not save anymore?

User avatar
sweetpotatoboy
Bibliophile
Posts: 1641
Joined: August 2008
Location: London, UK

Post by sweetpotatoboy » Mon January 7th, 2013, 3:51 pm

[quote=""Lenka""]Could I translate the meaning : Ambitious mamas were nudging their daughters and pointing to the two Bridgerton brothers, off by themselves with no company save for their sister..that they were standing there alone except for their sister?

Or were they her save? Or their company was not save anymore?[/quote]

Your first interpretation is correct. The brothers are standing or sitting away from the rest of the crowd (off = away from everyone else). They are "by themselves" (alone) and "with no company" (unaccompanied) - so these two phrases really mean the same thing. The only exception is their sister. "Save for" is simply a slightly archaic/formal way of saying "except". You should not interpret it in any other way.
There are on their own. The only person accompanying them is their sister.

Post Reply

Return to “Historical Romance”