Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Celtic families: who's your daddy?

User avatar
Margaret
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 2440
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
Location: Catskill, New York, USA
Contact:

Post by Margaret » Fri May 18th, 2012, 9:29 pm

Also, there were different classes of "marriage" in pagan Celtic society, one of which involved a one-time fling behind the shrubbery, and another of which involved a limited term of one year (but which could presumably be converted, if both parties wished, into the indefinite variety). A "wife" of the shrubbery fling sort would not, I presume, have been considered unfaithful if she entered into another such "marriage" a week or two later.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info

erechwydd
Reader
Posts: 104
Joined: November 2011
Location: Somerset
Contact:

Post by erechwydd » Sat May 19th, 2012, 2:15 pm

Margaret, I agree; it very much depends on how you define 'marriage'. ;)

User avatar
Margaret
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 2440
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
Location: Catskill, New York, USA
Contact:

Post by Margaret » Sun May 20th, 2012, 4:18 am

I was rather charmed when I discovered the statute referring to marriages of the behind-the-bushes sort. But I don't suppose the Celts would have thought all that much differently about it than we do. I think the main reason they used the same term for it as for other marriages was that they didn't stigmatize any children born of such unions.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info

Post Reply

Return to “Questions and Research”