I grew up reading my grandmother's Smithsonian Magazines and was excited when I ordered my first subscription with a Christmas gift card. Having ordered it before the New Year, I figured I would receive the February issue with no problem. Well it is not the middle of February and I have yet to recieve a magazine, but no worries! I received a nice little letter from Smithsonian that began with "Dear Member" and proceeded to tell me that because of increasing costs, unless I renew subscription for another year right away, I would have to pay more for the magazine. Needless to say, I was pissed! Having worked in the nonprofit sector all of my career (as short as it may be) and receiving my Master's in nonprofit management, I'm pretty damn sure it is bad policy to start any letter to members as "Dear Member."
After sending an e-mail letting them know how disappointed I was with their customer service, I received an e-mail letting me know that it was not the Smithsonian that sent that letter and that they could not cancel my subscription because I didn't order it directly from them. Not only do I get a nice threatening letter regarding raising my rates, but now I'm made to feel stupid because according to them, it wasn't the magazine at all. Funny considering it was a letter that was on Smithsonian letterhead, Smithsonian envelope, and signed by Cheryl Stevens, Smithsonian Magazine.
So upset by what I deemed to be complete disrespect on their part, I wrote the following in an e-mail and on their FB page:
Dear Smithsonian Magazine,
If you would prefer people didn't cancel their subscriptions on a regular basis, please accept the following advice. 1). Do not take 8+ weeks to send the first magazine to your subscribers. 2). Do you not send a letter addressing said subscribers as "Dear Member" as if you cannot be bothered to spend the extra 5 seconds to personalize your mailing. 3). Do not under any circumstances send out a letter requesting (more like threatening) to raise my subscription rates if I do not renew my subscription, especially when I haven't received one magazine yet! 4). Do not tell your namless member who now wants to discontinue said subscription for all of the reasons listed above that it wasn't Smithsonian that sent me this little letter when it is on Smithsonian letterhead, Smithsonian envelopes, and signed by a person who has Smithsonian Magazine subscriptions in their title!
Sincerely,
Your namless member who is severly disappointed by Smithsonian Magazine
Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Smithsonian Magazine
- LoveHistory
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: September 2008
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
- Contact:
- DianeL
- Bibliophile
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: May 2011
- Location: Midatlantic east coast, United States
- Contact:
Hee. Rowan, do you mean he's never had a problem? For a sec, I was confused, thinking - "Why doesn't he call them? That's ridiculous!"
"To be the queen, she agreed to be the widow!"
***
The pre-modern world was willing to attribute charisma to women well before it was willing to attribute sustained rationality to them.
---Medieval Kingship, Henry A. Myers
***
http://dianelmajor.blogspot.com/
I'm a Twit: @DianeLMajor
***
The pre-modern world was willing to attribute charisma to women well before it was willing to attribute sustained rationality to them.
---Medieval Kingship, Henry A. Myers
***
http://dianelmajor.blogspot.com/
I'm a Twit: @DianeLMajor