Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

NF - "Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman" by Robert K. Massie

Post Reply
User avatar
fljustice
Bibliophile
Posts: 1995
Joined: March 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

NF - "Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman" by Robert K. Massie

Post by fljustice » Fri December 2nd, 2011, 5:50 pm

From the book jacket:

"The Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Peter the Great, Nicholas and Alexandra, and The Romanovs returns with another masterpiece of narrative biography, the extraordinary story of an obscure young German princess who traveled to Russia at fourteen and rose to become one of the most remarkable, powerful, and captivating women in history."

My review:

Massie delivers a wonderfully researched and readable book. My knowledge of Catherine the Great was vague to the point of mythical. I had hazy memories of multiple lovers, a (possible) scandal about her and a horse, and a movie starring Greta Garbo. The lovers were real, but few; there was no mention of the horse; and the Garbo movie turned out to be about Queen Christina of Sweden who lived a century earlier. So much for memory.

To say Catherine is a fascinating character is to do her a disservice. Massie shows her towering intellect, force of personality, and steely resolve from an early age. He also shows her craving for love and approval; denied in childhood and in her marriage. But her story is not a simplistic psycho-drama, it's populated with complicated characters, shifting political agendas (both domestic and foreign), and colored with the burgeoning philosophies of the Age of Enlightenment.

Her life (1729 - 1796) spanned a turbulent time in the American colonies (of which I have a great deal more knowledge.) It was fun to see our revolution reduced to a postscript in one chapter where Britain asked Russia for some troops to send to America. (Catherine didn't send any, so the Brits hired Hessians instead.) Later our "Father of the Navy" John Paul Jones worked for Catherine as an Admiral. While we were fighting our (mostly) backwoods guerrilla war, Catherine was partitioning Poland, expanding Russia to the Black Sea (at Turkey's expense) and building the finest art collection in Europe. She wrote a remarkable document on human rights and government, several years before our Declaration of Independence and called a cross-class assembly to "advise" her very early in her rule. She advocated freeing the Russian serfs, while we were legitimizing slavery in our Constitution.

Unfortunately, the Russian nobility wasn't ready for those significant changes. They completely balked at freeing their serfs/slaves and it was the nobility that put Catherine on the throne and kept her there. The peasants that were part of the advisory assembly were completely cowed; poorly educated, they turned their "votes" over to the nobility. So Catherine started a series of reforms and education that she could accomplish. Over her thirty-four year reign, she sent hundreds of young talented Russians to the great universities of Europe (at crown expense), trained doctors and established hospitals in all regions of her empire, built model "foundling homes" that were the envy of Europe, forbade torture as part of interrogation and abolished the death penalty for all but high treason. Catherine became much more conservative as she aged and felt threatened by the bloody horror of the French Revolution, but she never outgrew her Enlightenment ideals about the human condition.

Massie takes seriously his subtitle: "Portrait of a Woman" by providing us with insight into Catherine's everyday life, her relationships, fears and triumphs. My heart went out to the young woman who gave birth to her first child, only to have the Empress Elizabeth snatch the child away within seconds, leaving the mother alone and bleeding on the floor for hours. She was never allowed to mother any of her children. Given her own mother's neglect, her insane husband's abuse and Elizabeth's horrendous treatment; it's a wonder Catherine turned out sane, much less one of the most powerful and insightful rulers in Europe. I loved the description of her informal meals and evenings where titles were not allowed, people were forbidden to rise when she stood and good humor was the order of the day.

Catherine was an incredibly hard-working ruler, rising at 6:00 am to start her day reading reports. She established a bureaucracy, but she was an absolute ruler, firmly believing that "enlightened autocracy" was the best way to rule the Russian people. She refused to be called "Catherine the Great", saying she was "Catherine II" or "Mother." Her success in wielding absolute power, came from her sensitivity to the possible. A young aide quoted Catherine on her technique,

"It is not as easy as you think," she replied. "In the first place, my orders would not be carried out unless they were the kind of orders which could be carried out. You know with what prudence and circumspection I act in the promulgation of my laws. I examine the circumstances, I take advice, I consult the enlightened part of the people, and in this way I find out what sort of effect my laws will have. And when I am already convinced in advance of good approval, then I issue my orders and have the pleasure of observing what you call blind obedience. That is the foundation of unlimited power. But believe me, they will not obey blindly when orders are not adapted to the opinion of the people."

Massie is a master of his art, presenting material that could be deadly dull in a lively manner. He primarily uses a chronological approach, with more "theme" chapters toward the end. Where there are controversies (such as the paternity of her children), Massie presents all sides and, when he takes a stand, supports his thesis with ample evidence. My only quibble is a minor one. Massie explored the relationships of all Catherine's "favorites"--mostly young guardsmen who serially occupied the suite of rooms attached to Catherine's with a back staircase. Most were "eye-candy" meant to escort Catherine to social events, accompany her on her travels, and basically keep her amused in any way she required. A few went on to other careers. The best known was Gregory Potemkin, to whom Catherine might have been married. When he left Catherine's bed, he became the most powerful man in the Empire. Massie sets us up early for some revelation about her final favorite Platon Zubov who was "in a class by himself." At the end of the book Zubov is sitting in Catherine's death chamber "alone in a corner, shunned by everyone." He never ties up that thread and we don't learn why Zubov is unique and shunned.

That tiny quibble aside, I highly recommend this one.

Note:[B/] I read an ARC (with several typos and formatting issues which should be taken care of in the final printing) received through the Early Readers Program at LibraryThing. The opinions are my own. This review also appears on my blog.

The details:

  • Title: Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman
  • Author: Robert K. Massie
  • Publisher: Random House, November 2011
  • Format: Advanced Readers Copy, 604 pages
  • ISBN: 978-0-679-45672-8
  • Also available in ebook
Faith L. Justice, Author Website
Image

User avatar
Misfit
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 9581
Joined: August 2008
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Misfit » Sat December 3rd, 2011, 12:23 am

Thanks Faith, I have to get back to this. I won a copy at Goodreads and have been getting side-tracked by other books. NF never was a strong suit with me anyway.
At home with a good book and the cat...
...is the only place I want to be

User avatar
Susan
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 3746
Joined: August 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by Susan » Sat December 3rd, 2011, 1:47 am

I'm going to get this at Costco tomorrow. Two weeks ago, I had it in my hands and my husband convinced me I didn't really need it. Well, he was wrong...I do need it!
~Susan~
~Unofficial Royalty~
Royal news updated daily, information and discussion about royalty past and present
http://www.unofficialroyalty.com/

User avatar
MLE (Emily Cotton)
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 3562
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
Favourite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
Location: California Bay Area

Post by MLE (Emily Cotton) » Sat December 3rd, 2011, 1:47 am

Thanks for the review, Faith. I don't claim to know a lot about the lady, other than a recent college course on Russian history. However, according to the author of the text, despite her enlightenment sympathies, Catherine's laws put more Russian peasants into serfdom than ever before when she ceded crown lands to various nobles to win their influence, including the enslavement of the peasants on those lands.

Did Massie make any mention of that?

User avatar
fljustice
Bibliophile
Posts: 1995
Joined: March 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Post by fljustice » Sat December 3rd, 2011, 5:23 pm

[quote=""MLE""]Thanks for the review, Faith. I don't claim to know a lot about the lady, other than a recent college course on Russian history. However, according to the author of the text, despite her enlightenment sympathies, Catherine's laws put more Russian peasants into serfdom than ever before when she ceded crown lands to various nobles to win their influence, including the enslavement of the peasants on those lands.

Did Massie make any mention of that?[/quote]

Her hands weren't complete clean. During her early years, she was very sensitive to the charge of "usurper" given the suspicious nature of her husband's death. Many wanted her to be regent for her son Paul, not ruler in her own right. She did give away lots of land, money, titles and other bribes to initially win over the nobility to her cause. Massie didn't address whether the peasants on the lands she gave away were "free" then became enslaved serfs. The Crown/state owned tens of thousands of serfs who worked primarily in mines and foundries. Early in her reign they revolted because of their wretched conditions. Catherine had the rebellion put down, but sent a commission to investigate, alleviate the worst conditions, and punish the worst overseers, but she didn't "free" them.

Massie makes it clear that serfs (vs. free peasants) were slaves by another name. They were "owned" and could be sold or used sexually and in pretty much any way the owner wanted including "breeding" to produce more serfs. Massie gives examples of ads for serfs with various skills including hairdresser, blacksmith and personal servant. Nobles had serfs trained as opera singers, musicians, and actors so they could put on their own shows. Massie sited instances where the performance wasn't up to snuff so the owners whipped their serfs during the intermission to "improve" their performance. Nobles kept their own slave astronomers, doctors, teachers and handkerchief holders.

Early in her reign, Catherine proposed laws that would give agricultural serfs a plot of land of their own and serfs in industry or service a wage, so they could eventually buy their freedom. When that was shot down, she proposed that when an estate changed hands upon the death of its owner, the serfs would be freed. The nobles again balked. They measured their wealth by how many serfs they owned, not the value of their land; so they thought the laws would strip their heirs of their birthrights. Eventually she realized freeing the serfs was a lost cause and left it to her descendants to deal with in the same way our founding fathers kicked the slavery can down the street for future generations.
Last edited by fljustice on Sun December 4th, 2011, 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Faith L. Justice, Author Website
Image

User avatar
princess garnet
Bibliophile
Posts: 1574
Joined: August 2008
Location: Maryland

Post by princess garnet » Sat December 3rd, 2011, 7:25 pm

Thanks! This is the 1st book he's written in some years.
For those who are on LibraryThing, there's an interview with Massie about his new book and researching.

User avatar
The Czar
Reader
Posts: 137
Joined: May 2011
Location: Nashville TN

Post by The Czar » Thu February 9th, 2012, 2:47 am

Oh! I'll have to get that. Massie is awesome. His bio of Peter the Great was wonderful.

I didn't care for dreadnought as much, but Nicholas and Alexandria was great too.

The Romanovs, by W. Bruce Lincoln is also great for Russia lovers.
Whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times. This arises from the fact that they are produced by men who ever have been, and ever shall be, animated by the same passions, and thus they necessarily have the same results.
_______________________________________________
Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli

Ash
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 2475
Joined: August 2008
Location: Arizona, USA

Post by Ash » Thu February 9th, 2012, 11:55 am

Ive been a fan of Massie since Nicholas and Alexandra. I have the book on my reading table, haven't gotten to it yet. Thanks for the review, glad it was a good one!

User avatar
Tanzanite
Bibliophile
Posts: 1963
Joined: August 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tanzanite » Thu February 9th, 2012, 10:39 pm

I really enjoyed this one. Once in a while it gets bogged down in details, but it's very readable and very fascinating.

Post Reply

Return to “By Author's Last Name M-Q”