Now here's a Princess dress I really do like

Misfit · Post by **Misfit** » Sat June 11th, 2011, 9:14 pm

On another note, is it me or is the dress Laura Bailey is wearing totally see-through?! Good thing her hands and purse are positioned where they are!

By golly, I think you're right.

SonjaMarie · Post by **SonjaMarie** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 2:02 am

[quote=""Misfit""]By golly, I think you're right.

[/quote]

O_O I wonder what it looks like without the strategically placed hands and purse!

SM

Misfit · Post by **Misfit** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 2:41 am

I know I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but can some one please tell me if I'm seeing what I think I'm seeing why would she do that?

MLE (Emily Cotton) · Post by **MLE (Emily Cotton)** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 3:25 am

Ten to one there's something swimsuit-like under the dress. The hands and purse are there to hide it, so you will think there isn't anything, just to be provocative.

Please note that she doesn't appear to have any navel--and undergarment is over it.

Michy · Post by **Michy** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 3:52 am

[quote=""Misfit""]why would she do that?[/quote] For attention, plain and simple.

You can see her panties through the dress -- so at least she did have something on underneath. Hopefully the panties were opaque enough to cover *cough* ...... Utterly disgusting, IMO.

SGM · Post by **SGM** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 6:07 am

I think there's some sort of body-stocking under there. Or maybe she is trying to do for knickers what Madonna did for the Wonder-Bra. But you have to have a decent set of legs to get aways with it.

Mythica · Post by **Mythica** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 9:15 am

[quote=""Divia""]I don't watch celeberty shows or anything like that so I wouldn't know if they do close ups of shoes. If so its weird.[/quote]

I don't think it's any different than anaylzing the dress. Accessories complete the outfit so it makes sense that people interested in the clothes would be interested in the shoes, purses and jewelry too.

LoveHistory · Post by **LoveHistory** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 11:32 am

Kate, thumbs up. Holly whatever her name is, thumbs down.

BrianPK · Post by **BrianPK** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 5:04 pm

[quote=""Misfit""]

[/quote]

Thank goodness it's Laura Bailey who decided to "dress" like this and not Kate Winslett.I just wouldn't have been able for it. At least Laura seems to have an extremely slim but natural figure whereas Kate (to my eyes) seems semi- anorexic. Now if Kate is naturally skinny,fair enough but I have deep suspicions that she's been living on lettuce leaves for the past six months to "look good" for her new life in front of the cameras. I saw a shot of her a few weeks ago in a short skirt and her thighs seem to be not much thicker than her knees.I don't think that's right and is sending out a very disturbing image to impressionable young girls. I also think that if she doesn't put a little weight on her face it will collapse into wrinkles before she's forty . . . but what the hell do I know about these things as I married a deliciously plumpish young girl many years ago.

SonjaMarie · Post by **SonjaMarie** » Sun June 12th, 2011, 5:43 pm

Who exactly is this Laura Bailey person?! I know, I know, I can google her, but I'm lazy, LOL!

SM