Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Pov?
I voted either, but generally I do prefer the third person, although a good author can do a nice job with first person, especially 19C authors. Bronte and Dickens come to mind. Multiple POV's are starting to grate on me now. I know I enjoyed it in PG's Boleyn Inheritance and Wier's Innocent Traitor, but I've just run into a couple of other books where it's been used and in one quite badly. Lucy Billy which was a Vine Book from Amazon. Dreadful.
- Julianne Douglas
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 429
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Northern California
[quote=""diamondlil""]Just wondering, if there are first and third person narratives, is there also a second person narrative?[/quote]
There is the practice of second-person narration, in which the narrator refers to the protagonist using the pronoun "you." For example, "You walk into the store and look around. When you see the pile of silk scarves on the counter, you saunter over and drape one about your shoulders. It feels like the soft arm of your best friend's mother on the day your own mother died." Lame, off-the-top of my head example, but you get the point.
It's very difficult to sustain this the length of an entire novel, but it is done, mostly in literary novels. The wikipedia entry "second-person narrative" gives a list of modern books that use this device.
There is the practice of second-person narration, in which the narrator refers to the protagonist using the pronoun "you." For example, "You walk into the store and look around. When you see the pile of silk scarves on the counter, you saunter over and drape one about your shoulders. It feels like the soft arm of your best friend's mother on the day your own mother died." Lame, off-the-top of my head example, but you get the point.
It's very difficult to sustain this the length of an entire novel, but it is done, mostly in literary novels. The wikipedia entry "second-person narrative" gives a list of modern books that use this device.
- Vanessa
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: August 2008
- Currently reading: The Farm at the Edge of the World by Sarah Vaughan
- Interest in HF: The first historical novel I read was Katherine by Anya Seton and this sparked off my interest in this genre.
- Favourite HF book: Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell!
- Preferred HF: Any
- Location: North Yorkshire, UK
I'm repeating myself, but I love books written in the first person, I feel like the character is chatting to me!
currently reading: My Books on Goodreads
Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you ~ The Shadow of the Wind
Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you ~ The Shadow of the Wind
I prefer third person, but no more than from one or two characters. If there are more than two I sometimes find it's just there to drag the story out to fill more pages and it's not always beneficial to the main story.
First person is more useful for emotional scenes, I agree. I don't mind novels written in first person, but what I do mind is if there's another character told in third person. It's sometimes done in time travel type novels. That is very confusing!
I prefer writing in third, too. For the sake of writing practice during a recent course, we did some paragraphs in second person pov. I didn't like it at all. It sounds outdated.
First person is more useful for emotional scenes, I agree. I don't mind novels written in first person, but what I do mind is if there's another character told in third person. It's sometimes done in time travel type novels. That is very confusing!
I prefer writing in third, too. For the sake of writing practice during a recent course, we did some paragraphs in second person pov. I didn't like it at all. It sounds outdated.
[quote=""Julianne Douglas""]There is the practice of second-person narration, in which the narrator refers to the protagonist using the pronoun "you." For example, "You walk into the store and look around. When you see the pile of silk scarves on the counter, you saunter over and drape one about your shoulders. It feels like the soft arm of your best friend's mother on the day your own mother died." [/quote]
Ah, takes me back to the when I was taking programming classes in the early 80's and we'd be playing Zork I on the mainframe instead of entering code! "You walk into the forest ..... You take a right turn at the oak tree .... wrong move, you're dead now, start over" or something like that. I never got very far alive in Zorkland.
Ah, takes me back to the when I was taking programming classes in the early 80's and we'd be playing Zork I on the mainframe instead of entering code! "You walk into the forest ..... You take a right turn at the oak tree .... wrong move, you're dead now, start over" or something like that. I never got very far alive in Zorkland.

We are the music makers, And we are the dreamers of dreams ~ Arthur O'Shaughnessy, Ode
- Margaret
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 2440
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
- Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
- Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
- Location: Catskill, New York, USA
- Contact:
I hesitated between "like both" and "third person" because there are many novels written in first person narrative that I have thoroughly enjoyed. Some novels demand to be written in this way. But when I thought about it, I had to give just a bit of an edge to third person narratives. It might seem ironic, but it's just a bit easier for me to lose myself in a novel and feel like I am inside the main character's skin, experiencing his or her life, when a novel is written in third person. The "storytelling" nature of a first-person narrative tends to have the effect, at least in the beginning, of making me feel like I am with another person who is telling me his or her story, putting me at one remove from the character rather than right inside. With a really well-written novel, the effect is negligible, though. For example, I just finished reading Catherine Delors's Mistress of the Revolution, which is first-person, and I was right inside the story all the time. But I do especially favor third person. And I dislike the present tense narration that has become all the rage lately, but that's another issue entirely.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info
- Madeleine
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: August 2008
- Currently reading: "The Rising Tide" by Ann Cleeves
- Preferred HF: Plantagenets, Victorian, crime, dual time-frame
- Location: Essex/London
I think either is fine, as long as it's well-written and a good story, although I agree that first person does feel more like the reader is being directly spoken to. However I do also like multiple viewpoints, although not too many as it can make the story a bit repetitive and feel like padding! Tracy Chevalier does multiple viewpoints particularly well I think.
I don't like second-person pov at all!
I don't like second-person pov at all!