Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Amazon buisness practices
Amazon buisness practices
Here's a long article "Books After Amazon" which takes a look at Amazon's business practices over the years and how they have affected the publishing industry. The comments were almost as interesting as the original article.
http://www.bostonreview.net/BR35.6/roychoudhuri.php
http://www.bostonreview.net/BR35.6/roychoudhuri.php
- MLE (Emily Cotton)
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
- Favourite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
- Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
- Location: California Bay Area
- LoveHistory
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: September 2008
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
- Contact:
Interesting that the "eBooks selling more copies than printed books" headline only referred to Amazon's sales. Not surprising given that 100% of Amazon customers are online, where B&N, and other retailers still have brick and mortar stores. Of course Amazon will sell more eBooks than hardcopies. A higher percentage of Amazon customers have the latest technology.
I used to love buying used books and movies on Amazon, but the shipping rates now completely offset any savings. $3.99 is great if you're buying a heavy book, but not great for a light one. Even Lulu doesn't charge that much, for crying out loud.
There are some things I just can't get anywhere but Amazon, but I'm going to make an effort to not buy my books from them from now on.
I used to love buying used books and movies on Amazon, but the shipping rates now completely offset any savings. $3.99 is great if you're buying a heavy book, but not great for a light one. Even Lulu doesn't charge that much, for crying out loud.
There are some things I just can't get anywhere but Amazon, but I'm going to make an effort to not buy my books from them from now on.
[quote=""MLE""]We have got to start patronizing more Amazon rivals and de-monopolize this retailer. I have a Kindle--but I intend to get another e-reader as well.[/quote]
My publisher was mixed up with the disappearing buy button mess when Amazon was squeezing everyone to use their POD subsidiary. They sued and won, but it was a bloody fight. I rarely buy from Amazon, and hold my nose whenever I have to. I wish I didn't have my book listed there, but they are the 500 pound gorilla and I do like those checks! (Not sure which emoticon to use for horribly conflicted.)
My publisher was mixed up with the disappearing buy button mess when Amazon was squeezing everyone to use their POD subsidiary. They sued and won, but it was a bloody fight. I rarely buy from Amazon, and hold my nose whenever I have to. I wish I didn't have my book listed there, but they are the 500 pound gorilla and I do like those checks! (Not sure which emoticon to use for horribly conflicted.)
I didn't read the entire article, but of what I did read, what stood out to me was Amazon's alleged "discriminatory pricing" (or whatever they call it). Whereby they charge different customers different prices for the same items, based on the customer's buying history. That, to me, sounds illegal with a capital "I." Can you imagine a bricks-and-mortar store trying to pull a stunt like that? I wonder how Amazon manages to get away with it?
[quote=""LoveHistory""]I used to love buying used books and movies on Amazon, but the shipping rates now completely offset any savings. $3.99 is great if you're buying a heavy book, but not great for a light one. Even Lulu doesn't charge that much, for crying out loud.
There are some things I just can't get anywhere but Amazon, but I'm going to make an effort to not buy my books from them from now on.[/quote]
Yeah I told my mom to buy used stuff from Amazon and she said what's the point when they are only a dollar or two of and then the shipping jacks up the price so much.
There are some things I just can't get anywhere but Amazon, but I'm going to make an effort to not buy my books from them from now on.[/quote]
Yeah I told my mom to buy used stuff from Amazon and she said what's the point when they are only a dollar or two of and then the shipping jacks up the price so much.
News, views, and reviews on books and graphic novels for young adult.
http://yabookmarks.blogspot.com/
http://yabookmarks.blogspot.com/
- LoveHistory
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: September 2008
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
- Contact:
[quote=""Michy""]I didn't read the entire article, but of what I did read, what stood out to me was Amazon's alleged "discriminatory pricing" (or whatever they call it). Whereby they charge different customers different prices for the same items, based on the customer's buying history. That, to me, sounds illegal with a capital "I." Can you imagine a bricks-and-mortar store trying to pull a stunt like that? I wonder how Amazon manages to get away with it?[/quote]
Yeah. I bet those of us who buy less get charged more, when we'd probably be willing to buy more if the prices were better. The principal of adverse selection goes retail.
Yeah. I bet those of us who buy less get charged more, when we'd probably be willing to buy more if the prices were better. The principal of adverse selection goes retail.
It's similar, in a way, to what many retailers do when they give "frequent shopper" points that can eventually be converted into discounts to use on future purchases. In essence, they're giving a type of price break to those who shop from them the most. But these practices are acceptable to consumers because they are above-board and straightforward, and everyone understands what's going on. In Amazon's case, however, it is entirely secretive, so that no one understands how much more or less they are paying for an item compared to anyone else. Again, I don't see how they get by with it, unless being an online-only retailer makes them harder to nail.
Speaking of "adverse selection" .... what always gets me is when banks and telephone carriers and others offer great incentives to attract new customers, an have the nerve to send these offers to their existing customers. My bank has been inundating me lately with offers of $150 if I'll just open a new checking account with them. Hey, I've been a loyal customer of theirs for years and years. So where's my $150?
Speaking of "adverse selection" .... what always gets me is when banks and telephone carriers and others offer great incentives to attract new customers, an have the nerve to send these offers to their existing customers. My bank has been inundating me lately with offers of $150 if I'll just open a new checking account with them. Hey, I've been a loyal customer of theirs for years and years. So where's my $150?

- LoveHistory
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: September 2008
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
- Contact: