Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ
by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register
link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
A place to debate issues or to rant about what's on your mind. In addition to discussions about historical fiction, books, the publishing industry, and history, discussions about current political, social, and religious issues and other topics are allowed, so those who are easily offended by certain topics may want to avoid such threads. Members are expected to keep the discussions friendly and polite and to avoid personal attacks on other members. The moderators reserve the right to shut down a thread without warning if they believe it necessary.
- Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
- Favorite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
- Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
- Location: Catskill, New York, USA
It had a modern day thread written in past tense and a historical thread written in present tense. Conventional logic might indicate that's backwards. I remember doing a double-take when I first started reading it, but after I settled in, it began to make sense to me and I was surprised not to be bothered by it.
That's a bit intriguing. I wonder if the author might have been thinking of past-life regression, in which the regressed person might well speak in present tense while "watching" the events of the past life unfold.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info
- Location: Always Cloudy, Central New York
I'll be hoenst I cannot recall every reading a present tense novel.
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
"keny from prague" wrote:very true. but i used to devour those as a young lad. its probably a guy thing, but there was something incredably satisfying about feeling like you had some control or influence over the events of the story. interactive reading. teachers hated the books but i loved them. and id read every possible ending.
Actually I loved those books too. Didn't run across many, and that may have added to their appeal for me.
- Location: Tarzana, CA (northwest of Los Angeles)
I think it is difficult to write an entire novel in the present-tense and have it not seem awkward. There is a screenplayish element to it - but a screenplay is a set of directions for a bunch of people making a movie. I think sections in the present tense can be very effective as a contrast to the general narrative of a novel. It might be used as a character seizes the narrative voice, taking over in first person present from a third person single viewpoint past tense. But I am not fond of an entire book in the present tense. I feel almost out of breath as I try to absorb the story.
Richard Warren Field
THE SWORDS OF FAITH, a unique novel about the "Third Crusade" (Richard the Lionheart and Saladin) that stresses tolerance between the faiths even during a time of great conflict.
Richard Warren Field's blog: http://creativeeccentric.wordpress.com
- Currently reading: The Silent Companions by Laura Purcell & And So It Begins by Rachel Abbott (Pigeonhole)
- Interest in HF: The first historical novel I read was Katherine by Anya Seton and this sparked off my interest in this genre.
- Favorite HF book: Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell!
- Preferred HF: Any
- Location: North Yorkshire, UK
I don't think I take too much notice. As long as I'm enjoying the story, it doesn't really matter to me, although I do have a preference for book written in the first person. I feel like they're chatting to me!!
currently reading: My Books on Goodreads Books are mirrors, you only see in them what you already have inside you
~ The Shadow of the Wind
MLE (Emily Cotton)
- Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
- Favorite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
- Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
- Location: California Bay Area
I dislike present tense. The only book I ever read written in that tense was Wolf Hall, and like sweetpotatoboy, the pronoun issue was evenmore annoying than the present tense, but I didn't like the book at all. I might not have disliked it so thoroughly if those two issues were removed. But the whole thing smacked of 'cleverness', and any hint of contrivance will put me off.
If the Help was written in present tense, I missed it entirely (odd, because usually if a book is written present tense, I won't even read past the first paragraph.) But I can't go check my copy as it is in California, and right now I'm in France.
- Currently reading: A Trail through Time by Jodi Taylor & Angel by L J Ross
- Preferred HF: Plantagenets, Victorian, crime
- Location: Essex/London
I must admit I'm not that keen on present tense, although if it's reasonably well-written and a good story then I'm OK with it.
I don't mind first person at all, I agree that it can seem as if the narrator is talking to me personally, although first person means you only tend to get one side of the story.
Currently reading "A Trail through Time" by Jodi Taylor & "Angel" by L J Ross
- Location: California
"Madeleine" wrote: although first person means you only tend to get one side of the story.
True, although if an author is really good they can manage to make other characters' feelings come through. I'm thinking of what Daphne du Maurier did with My Cousin Rachel.
- Location: North London
"Michy" wrote:True, although if an author is really good they can manage to make other characters' feelings come through. I'm thinking of what Daphne du Maurier did with My Cousin Rachel.
Or get some plot mileage out of the central character's misinterpretations, as du Maurier did in Rebecca
. She certainly was the queen of first-person.
- Location: Seattle, WA
"Miss Moppet" wrote:Or get some plot mileage out of the central character's misinterpretations, as du Maurier did in Rebecca. She certainly was the queen of first-person.
Yes she was, and the male voice at that.
Return to “Debate/Rant Forum”