Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Research and characterization question

Got a question/comment about the creative process of writing? Post it here!
User avatar
Matt Phillips
Reader
Posts: 100
Joined: August 2009

Research and characterization question

Post by Matt Phillips » Thu July 29th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Thought this one might be a good question to toss out to the group. Having done a lot of research and writing academically and for my career, I've felt at home doing most of the research for my WIP. I understand how to use the research on actual events, people, daily life and places in the description of setting and action. When writing scenes, it seems pretty straightforward to me to refer to notes and sources to pull in the appropriate specific facts.

But what I'm wondering about is characterization, and research about people's way of thinking and feeling as opposed to the hard facts of history. I've done a fair amount of research on the culture, psychology and worldview of people in this time and place and am reading primary sources to get a flavor for their thoughts and language. Is there a process or method any of you use to make sure the dialogue, thoughts and motivations of your characters stay appropriate to the time? Or is it something that ideally should emerge automatically as you write, if you've done the right research? Or is it something you address in the revision phase, reading your manuscript with a particular eye toward the authenticity of language and emotion?

Thanks for any feedback!

Celia Hayes
Reader
Posts: 102
Joined: June 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post by Celia Hayes » Sat July 31st, 2010, 10:21 pm

I don't know how this would work for your particular period, but I write about the American frontier, in the 19th century - and what works for me, to get into the 19th century feeling, is to read contemporary works - letters, memoirs, traveler's accounts, novels ... Mark Twain is beyond price for getting a feel about how genuine frontiersmen may have talked.
It's a bit like an actor picking up an accent, I think - after a through immersion in a particular voice and mind-set, I find that I can write it very convincingly.
YMMV, of course.
Celia Hayes
www.celiahayes.com

Russ Whitfield
Reader
Posts: 84
Joined: August 2010
Location: Richmond, Surrey
Contact:

Post by Russ Whitfield » Fri August 27th, 2010, 9:37 am

I think research should be like a bad case of silent farting. Your work should reek of it but you can't be too blatant cos you'll end up offending people.

I reckon that if you're really steeped in the history, it'll come through in the writing...you know in your characters attitudes and stuff like that. In the case of ...say...a frontier family in the American West, I'm sure they wouldn't have the almost reverential attitude we have today for American Indian culture for instance.

Its always a toughie though: I was reading some comments by an author who spoke about "the would-be savants." No matter how much you research there's always someone out there who'll tell you you've got it totally wrong even when you know you haven't!

User avatar
MLE (Emily Cotton)
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 3566
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
Favourite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
Location: California Bay Area

Post by MLE (Emily Cotton) » Fri August 27th, 2010, 2:30 pm

re-enactment. It gives you a feeling no amount of book-larnin' will. Yes, at times it's cheesy and OTT, but do it long enough and some parts will become second nature.

You're lucky that there are several groups doing your period/place. If you were writing, say, Genghis Khan, you'd be out of luck.

User avatar
Michy
Bibliophile
Posts: 1649
Joined: May 2010
Location: California

Post by Michy » Fri August 27th, 2010, 3:11 pm

[quote=""Russ Whitfield""]I think research should be like a bad case of silent farting. Your work should reek of it but you can't be too blatant cos you'll end up offending people.

[/quote]

What a disgusting analogy.

Russ Whitfield
Reader
Posts: 84
Joined: August 2010
Location: Richmond, Surrey
Contact:

Post by Russ Whitfield » Fri August 27th, 2010, 3:33 pm

[quote=""Michy""]What a disgusting analogy.[/quote]

Works though, don't it. ;)

User avatar
Ken
Compulsive Reader
Posts: 633
Joined: April 2009
Location: Truro, Cornwall, UK

Post by Ken » Fri August 27th, 2010, 4:42 pm

[quote=""Russ Whitfield""]Works though, don't it. ;) [/quote]

No, actually - it doesn't!

User avatar
Matt Phillips
Reader
Posts: 100
Joined: August 2009

Post by Matt Phillips » Fri August 27th, 2010, 7:03 pm

[quote=""Ken""]No, actually - it doesn't![/quote]


Maybe a better one would be a crackling fire in the fireplace? A good one should be strong enough for the pleasant aroma and background sounds to fill the room, but not rage out of control and burn the house down.

Thanks for the feedback, everyone! MLE - I definitely agree about living history and have done a few workshops; I will continue doing so, since I'm fortunate enough to have a couple of living history colonial farms in my area, and hopefully attending and participating in their events will help me give a sense of authenticity to my writing.

User avatar
michellemoran
Bibliophile
Posts: 1186
Joined: August 2008
Contact:

Post by michellemoran » Fri August 27th, 2010, 8:55 pm

Its always a toughie though: I was reading some comments by an author who spoke about "the would-be savants." No matter how much you research there's always someone out there who'll tell you you've got it totally wrong even when you know you haven't!
Russ, this is true. Readers have pointed out flaws in my novels - sometimes, they've been right, other times, they're wrong (although they're very much convinced otherwise!). As for time-appropriate characterization, I find that with my writing, this comes not only from the setting, but even importantly, the events. How did the character historically react to a specific event? It tells us a lot about them.
Visit MichelleMoran.com
Check out Michelle's blog History Buff at michellemoran.blogspot.com

User avatar
Miss Moppet
Bibliophile
Posts: 1726
Joined: April 2009
Location: North London
Contact:

Post by Miss Moppet » Fri August 27th, 2010, 9:59 pm

ROFL at this thread. Yes, maybe my avatar has that startled expression because she just smelled some 'research' in the room.

I like Matt's fire analogy. Much better than the stupid old iceberg quote.

Post Reply

Return to “The Craft of Writing”