Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

"The Rise of the Saxons"

annis
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 4585
Joined: August 2008

"The Rise of the Saxons"

Post by annis » Wed November 26th, 2008, 10:06 pm

Has anyone read this novel?
"The Rise of the Saxons: And the Legend of Hengist and Horsa", by Ryan West ?

It's British and I'm guessing self-published, and I can't find out anything about the author. There's a review attached to the Amazon listing, but the reviewer has a rather dodgy taste in books, so I'd probably rather hear from someone else!

It is a period I'm interested in, so if it was any good I'd probably try to track down a copy.

User avatar
Misfit
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 9581
Joined: August 2008
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Misfit » Wed November 26th, 2008, 10:22 pm

Here's his reviews on .uk if that helps any.

User avatar
EC2
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 3661
Joined: August 2008
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Post by EC2 » Wed November 26th, 2008, 10:36 pm

[quote=""annis""]Has anyone read this novel?
"The Rise of the Saxons: And the Legend of Hengist and Horsa", by Ryan West ?

It's British and I'm guessing self-published, and I can't find out anything about the author. There's a review attached to the Amazon listing, but the reviewer has a rather dodgy taste in books, so I'd probably rather hear from someone else!

It is a period I'm interested in, so if it was any good I'd probably try to track down a copy.[/quote]

Yes, it's published by Author House - who are a vanity press as far as I know.
The reviewer certainly has a thing about exclamation marks!!!!!!!!
Les proz e les vassals
Souvent entre piez de chevals
Kar ja li coard n’I chasront

'The Brave and the valiant
Are always to be found between the hooves of horses
For never will cowards fall down there.'

Histoire de Guillaume le Mareschal

www.elizabethchadwick.com

User avatar
Margaret
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 2440
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
Location: Catskill, New York, USA
Contact:

Post by Margaret » Thu November 27th, 2008, 2:09 am

Yes, AuthorHouse is for people who self-publish. I wouldn't be too hopeful about the quality of this book. Authors who self-publish historical fiction have often done quite good research and fail to find a mainstream publisher primarily because of deficits in their prose style and/or storytelling ability. In this case, though, the Amazon reviewer does, while going overboard to express enthusiasm, strongly hint that the research on this one is biased and not to be trusted.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info

Carla
Compulsive Reader
Posts: 965
Joined: August 2008
Contact:

Post by Carla » Sun January 11th, 2009, 7:27 pm

I haven't read it, and from the review I suspect it's not my thing as I'm generally of the 'less is more' persuasion when it comes to violence.

With regard to the history, there essentially isn't any. Nothing is known for sure about Hengist and Horsa, not even if they really existed. The sources for the legend date from centuries after the event. So any novel purporting to tell "Hengest's story" or the "story of the Anglo-Saxon Invasion*" is going to be primarily fiction. I highly, highly doubt whether it could reasonably be called "a great historical lesson". It might or might not be a good story - I can't comment on that - but I would be very wary of trying to treat it as history.

Edited: There are some more reviews on Amazon.co.uk http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rise-Saxons-Leg ... 1438924003
I am now even more wary of the history.

*If there was any such thing.
Last edited by Carla on Sun January 11th, 2009, 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PATHS OF EXILE - love, war, honour and betrayal in Anglo-Saxon Northumbria
Editor's Choice, Historical Novels Review, August 2009
Now available as e-book on Amazon Kindleand in Kindle, Epub (Nook, Sony Reader), Palm and other formats on Smashwords
Website: http://www.carlanayland.org
Blog: http://carlanayland.blogspot.com

annis
Bibliomaniac
Posts: 4585
Joined: August 2008

Post by annis » Mon January 12th, 2009, 2:37 am

Thanks, Carla. I did read the Amazon reviews (American & British) and decided to give the book a miss, despite the enthusiatic reviewer, whose taste appears to be of the "National Front" variety- something which I find abhorrent.
If the author's an apologist for white supremacy I'm not interested :(
The book would have to be a mythistorical, given the lack of information about the period. That doesn't preclude a good story, but I just don't like the vibes.
Last edited by annis on Mon January 12th, 2009, 2:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Carla
Compulsive Reader
Posts: 965
Joined: August 2008
Contact:

Post by Carla » Tue January 13th, 2009, 12:33 pm

I tend to regard Hengist and Horsa & co as about as historical or mythical as King Arthur. They appear in broadly similar sources with broadly similar amounts of detail. Hengist and Horsa get extra historical points for being named in Bede, which Arthur isn't, but conversely I would deduct points for them not being mentioned anywhere else in surviving Old English literature except (Hengest only) The Fight at Finnsburh, whereas Arthur turns up in Culhwch and Olwen, The Dream of Rhonabwy and the Triads, not counting the miscellaneous Saints Lives and the medieval romances.
PATHS OF EXILE - love, war, honour and betrayal in Anglo-Saxon Northumbria
Editor's Choice, Historical Novels Review, August 2009
Now available as e-book on Amazon Kindleand in Kindle, Epub (Nook, Sony Reader), Palm and other formats on Smashwords
Website: http://www.carlanayland.org
Blog: http://carlanayland.blogspot.com

User avatar
Rowan
Bibliophile
Posts: 1462
Joined: August 2008
Interest in HF: I love history, but it's boring in school. Historical fiction brings it alive for me.
Preferred HF: Iron-Age Britain, Roman Britain, Medieval Britain
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Post by Rowan » Tue January 13th, 2009, 2:15 pm

So out of curiosity, when does myth become fact?

Carla
Compulsive Reader
Posts: 965
Joined: August 2008
Contact:

Post by Carla » Tue January 13th, 2009, 8:08 pm

Good question. I think it depends on the level of supporting evidence, which like many things is a continuum.

At the 'factual' end of the spectrum I would put things that were recorded in contemporary documents and where some (ideally all) the statements are confirmed by independent sources. E.g. the date of the Battle of Waterloo would be in contemporary newspapers, Wellington's reports and no doubt assorted soldiers' letters home. Wellington and Napoleon appear in many other records from the time.

At the 'mythical' end of the spectrum I would put things written down in one source that says vaguely that this happened a long time ago, and where the people and events aren't verified in an independent source. E.g., as far as I know Homer is the sole source for Helen being kidnapped by Paris and taken to Troy, and he says something along the lines of these events having happened a long (unspecified) time ago.

There's a lot of middle ground between these two extremes. E.g. if contemporary sources disagree, which one do you take as 'fact'? What if two sources agree but you know both of them were written by people with a vested interest in promulgating a particular version of events? What if something is recorded in two different sources but they are centuries after the event? What if recorded in a single near-contemporary source but not mentioned anywhere else? And so on. Then you have to make a judgement about whether you think the evidence is strong enough to count as a 'fact'. That's a matter of judgement, and is going to vary between different people. Hence historians don't always agree with each other.

I don't suppose that's a very helpful answer! But I don't think there is a simple answer.

Anyone else want to have a go?
PATHS OF EXILE - love, war, honour and betrayal in Anglo-Saxon Northumbria
Editor's Choice, Historical Novels Review, August 2009
Now available as e-book on Amazon Kindleand in Kindle, Epub (Nook, Sony Reader), Palm and other formats on Smashwords
Website: http://www.carlanayland.org
Blog: http://carlanayland.blogspot.com

User avatar
rex icelingas
Reader
Posts: 74
Joined: March 2009

Post by rex icelingas » Sat March 28th, 2009, 8:19 am

I would also if your interested in this era track down `Vortigern-the man who betrayed his people` by Samantha Pepperall,bit of a strange book that reads like it was written by Welsh Bards in the 12th Cent

I think the best thing to be said for the era of late antiquity is-Dont believe what you read! There are a billion Arthurian books all of which make some outstanding claims that they fail to back up.Read as much on the era as you can and slowly form your own judgement of what is plausible and what isnt, and always keep challenging those old theories!

Post Reply

Return to “Early Medieval (until about 1000 A.D.)”