Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Alexander the Great and Ancient Greek Warfare
- Margaret
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 2440
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
- Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
- Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
- Location: Catskill, New York, USA
- Contact:
Alexander the Great and Ancient Greek Warfare
Annis has contributed a review of Christian Cameron's Tyrant for HistoricalNovels.info. As usual, she really evokes the atmosphere of the story. She tells me Christian Cameron is a war-gamer and re-enactor, so this novel should have a lot of appeal for that crowd, along with others who enjoy novels of ancient warfare and power politics.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info
-
- Reader
- Posts: 64
- Joined: February 2010
- Location: Going back in Time
Cool! Glad you're enjoying "Tyrant", Chris- i couldn't put it down Cameron commented that his books sell much better in the UK than in the States which surprised me a bit- I would have thought Steven Pressfield's success might have paved the way for CC's novels.
I occurs to me that you might also like Henry Treece's Mycenaean trilogy, as being rather in the spirit of Shipway's work. Jason covers some similar territory to "Warrior in Bronze"
1) Jason
2) Electra (also spelt Elektra for some editions)- US title The Amber Princess
3) Oedipus --US title The Eagle King
I occurs to me that you might also like Henry Treece's Mycenaean trilogy, as being rather in the spirit of Shipway's work. Jason covers some similar territory to "Warrior in Bronze"
1) Jason
2) Electra (also spelt Elektra for some editions)- US title The Amber Princess
3) Oedipus --US title The Eagle King
Last edited by annis on Sun May 2nd, 2010, 7:10 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Reader
- Posts: 64
- Joined: February 2010
- Location: Going back in Time
-
- Scribbler
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 2009
- Margaret
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 2440
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
- Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
- Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
- Location: Catskill, New York, USA
- Contact:
Kallithrix, I don't think you intended to imply that Annis simply plagiarized the jacket copy, but some may take your comment that way. If readers compare the review and the promotional copy posted on the Waterstones website, they'll see that is not the case.
Obviously, Annis quite enjoyed Tyrant. I've found that her taste runs to military adventure novels with a thoughtful undertone, among other subjects. Other readers may feel differently.
Obviously, Annis quite enjoyed Tyrant. I've found that her taste runs to military adventure novels with a thoughtful undertone, among other subjects. Other readers may feel differently.
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info
Space limitations for reviews on Margarets website dont really lend themselves to lengthy literary critique, Kallithrix, so my aim is more to give readers a flavour of the book Im reviewing. I make no apologies for the fact that if Ive really enjoyed a book Im more than happy to wear my heart on my sleeve and say so, and in fact novels I review for Margaret tend to be ones Ive found particularly interesting and/or appealing.
I will make more measured critique of a novel if I feel it is warranted (see my comment here on Paul Waters Cast not the Day for example), but will do so in a different forum.
There were very few criticisms I could make of Camerons Tyrant, which fulfilled the expectations of a historical military adventure admirably, in my opinion. My only quibble would be his occasional tendency to quote perhaps over-long chunks of Homer, but given the cultural significance of the Iliad and particularly the place of Achilles in the psyches of both the main character, Kineas, and Alexander the Great himself, I thought it acceptable. The irony that Alexander sees Achilles as hero whereas we would now see him as much monster is not lost in Camerons interpretation of Alexander.
I do make a point of not reading blurbs and other reviews for a book I think I might review, but inevitably the facts of a storys plotline remain the same and various reviewers may describe them in similar ways- thats probably unavoidable.
I will make more measured critique of a novel if I feel it is warranted (see my comment here on Paul Waters Cast not the Day for example), but will do so in a different forum.
There were very few criticisms I could make of Camerons Tyrant, which fulfilled the expectations of a historical military adventure admirably, in my opinion. My only quibble would be his occasional tendency to quote perhaps over-long chunks of Homer, but given the cultural significance of the Iliad and particularly the place of Achilles in the psyches of both the main character, Kineas, and Alexander the Great himself, I thought it acceptable. The irony that Alexander sees Achilles as hero whereas we would now see him as much monster is not lost in Camerons interpretation of Alexander.
I do make a point of not reading blurbs and other reviews for a book I think I might review, but inevitably the facts of a storys plotline remain the same and various reviewers may describe them in similar ways- thats probably unavoidable.
- parthianbow
- Compulsive Reader
- Posts: 856
- Joined: April 2009
- Location: Nr. Bristol, SW England
- Contact:
Annis, thanks for your review. I have to read Cameron's books - I've meant to for ages, but am slightly constrained by the day job He's a big participant on the Greek section of romanarmy.com too. Interesting to see he's also branching out into a different time period.
Last edited by parthianbow on Tue May 18th, 2010, 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: error
Reason: error
Ben Kane
Bestselling author of Roman military fiction.
Spartacus - UK release 19 Jan. 2012. US release June 2012.
http://www.benkane.net
Twitter: @benkaneauthor
Bestselling author of Roman military fiction.
Spartacus - UK release 19 Jan. 2012. US release June 2012.
http://www.benkane.net
Twitter: @benkaneauthor
-
- Scribbler
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 2009
No offence intended!
Margaret, I certainly didn't mean to imply that Annis had plagiarised the jacket blurb, I was simply expressing my view that the review was more descriptive of the plot details than a critique of the novel, which is not what I would normally expect from a review.
Annis, I take on board your comment about limited space to express your views, and perhaps you are simply constrained by the brief given to you by the site owner. However in a review of more than 300 words, which is about the same if not more than that given to newspaper or magazine reviews, I would have expected more than just a plot outline and brief summary of the main character. You only really give us any assessment of the novel's quality in the last paragraph, which still reads like marketing blurb rather than critique. I wasn't expecting a dissertation, just something that would tell me what respective merits I could expect this book to have in relation to similar books in the genre.
That's just my two cents.
Annis, I take on board your comment about limited space to express your views, and perhaps you are simply constrained by the brief given to you by the site owner. However in a review of more than 300 words, which is about the same if not more than that given to newspaper or magazine reviews, I would have expected more than just a plot outline and brief summary of the main character. You only really give us any assessment of the novel's quality in the last paragraph, which still reads like marketing blurb rather than critique. I wasn't expecting a dissertation, just something that would tell me what respective merits I could expect this book to have in relation to similar books in the genre.
That's just my two cents.