Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Marie Antoinette - The Journey - By Antonia Fraser
Marie Antoinette - The Journey - By Antonia Fraser
Of all the biographies of Marie Antoinette, this is one of those, I think, that stays with you forever. The understanding and love the author has for her subject(s) is so obvious and the work completely dispels the myth of the simpering, careless little queen and protrays her development from a lost child in a foreign country to a gracious and courageous wife and mother.
How utterly harrowing are the descriptions of the 'trial' and the forced accusations made against her by the son whom she loved. How moving, too, is the devotion that - after years of amicable infidelity - M-A declined the opportunity to escape and stayed with her husband.
This wonderful book, read alongside Vincent Cronin's "Louis and Antoinette", gives the fullest, most tender picture of these unfortunate and courageous victims of 'the terror'.
How utterly harrowing are the descriptions of the 'trial' and the forced accusations made against her by the son whom she loved. How moving, too, is the devotion that - after years of amicable infidelity - M-A declined the opportunity to escape and stayed with her husband.
This wonderful book, read alongside Vincent Cronin's "Louis and Antoinette", gives the fullest, most tender picture of these unfortunate and courageous victims of 'the terror'.
I haven't read this one by Fraser. I have read Abundance by Naslund which is a very good HF take on M. Antoinette. I think she is often misconstrued in novels, from her famous quotation (that she did not make) "Let them eat cake" to being a simpering spoiled brat.
Only the pure of heart can make good soup. - Beethoven
- Catherine Delors
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Paris, London, Los Angeles
- Contact:
[quote=""Catherine Delors""]Actually she never said "Let them eat cake."
http://blog.catherinedelors.com/2008/03 ... -cake.aspx[/quote]
That's right! That is why I said it is the famous quotation that she never made. Probably missed it in the brackets.
http://blog.catherinedelors.com/2008/03 ... -cake.aspx[/quote]
That's right! That is why I said it is the famous quotation that she never made. Probably missed it in the brackets.
Only the pure of heart can make good soup. - Beethoven
- Catherine Delors
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Paris, London, Los Angeles
- Contact:
- Catherine Delors
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: Paris, London, Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Sofia Coppola's MA.
Laura, it depends on what you expect from a historical film. I thought it was very appealing visually. But as a realistic depiction of Marie-Antoinette, it was a complete failure. Kirsten Dunst was wrong for the part, the guy who played Louis XVI was a walking disaster. Rip Thorn (sp?) was good as Louis XV, though.
The whole idea behind the film, the Marie-Antoinette the all-American teenager concept was off. Even the much-vaunted costumes were beautiful, but they didn't fit Marie-Antoinette's tastes. As an adult she wasn't into pinks and powder blues, she liked deep reds and dark blues, in addition to white of course.
The worst was to cut the whole end of Marie-Antoinette's life, when she became so active politically, and showed such energy and courage. That wouldn't have fit the sugar-coated tone of the film, I guess.
Again visually and musically it is very cute, but it wasn't right to slap Marie-Antoinette's name on it.
Laura, it depends on what you expect from a historical film. I thought it was very appealing visually. But as a realistic depiction of Marie-Antoinette, it was a complete failure. Kirsten Dunst was wrong for the part, the guy who played Louis XVI was a walking disaster. Rip Thorn (sp?) was good as Louis XV, though.
The whole idea behind the film, the Marie-Antoinette the all-American teenager concept was off. Even the much-vaunted costumes were beautiful, but they didn't fit Marie-Antoinette's tastes. As an adult she wasn't into pinks and powder blues, she liked deep reds and dark blues, in addition to white of course.
The worst was to cut the whole end of Marie-Antoinette's life, when she became so active politically, and showed such energy and courage. That wouldn't have fit the sugar-coated tone of the film, I guess.
Again visually and musically it is very cute, but it wasn't right to slap Marie-Antoinette's name on it.