[quote=""Miss Moppet""]
But I can't see anyone referring to John as the King-Duke. He was also Count of Anjou and Duke of Aquitaine, so why not refer to him as the King-Duke-Count-Duke? [/quote]
LOL on "King-Duke-Count-Duke."
The only parallel I can come up with is from the 16th century, so hundreds of years later and who knows how customs may have changed? But Mary Stuart was called the "Reine-Dauphine" after she married poor little Francois. Somehow it sounds better in French.
Welcome to the Historical Fiction Online forums: a friendly place to discuss, review and discover historical fiction.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You will have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing posts, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
A little medieval help please
THE RED LILY CROWN: A Novel of Medici Florence.
THE FLOWER READER.
THE SECOND DUCHESS.
www.elizabethloupas.com
THE FLOWER READER.
THE SECOND DUCHESS.
www.elizabethloupas.com
[quote=""Michy""]I thought of that angle, but wasn't sure because Eleanor is/was always referred to as Duchess of Aquitaine, not Duke..... ?[/quote]
Because Eleanor was an heiress and whoever married her got to be the Duke, which technically outranked her. She was expected to marry and didn't hold the Duchy in her own right. When Henry married her he became the Duke and ruler. That's why she was such a great marriage prize.
Anne B. was a pretty extraordinary case for the time, but it showed what Henry was prepared to do for her. He was also safeguarding any children they might've had out of wedlock.
Queen Elizabeth II is also the Duke of Lancaster .
Because Eleanor was an heiress and whoever married her got to be the Duke, which technically outranked her. She was expected to marry and didn't hold the Duchy in her own right. When Henry married her he became the Duke and ruler. That's why she was such a great marriage prize.
Anne B. was a pretty extraordinary case for the time, but it showed what Henry was prepared to do for her. He was also safeguarding any children they might've had out of wedlock.
Queen Elizabeth II is also the Duke of Lancaster .
Jenny
"Well-behaved women rarely make history." Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
Currently Reading:
"Well-behaved women rarely make history." Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
Currently Reading:
- Margaret
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 2440
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: I can't answer this in 100 characters. Sorry.
- Favourite HF book: Checkmate, the final novel in the Lymond series
- Preferred HF: Literary novels. Late medieval and Renaissance.
- Location: Catskill, New York, USA
- Contact:
Now, there's something I didn't know!Queen Elizabeth II is also the Duke of Lancaster
Browse over 5000 historical novel listings (probably well over 5000 by now, but I haven't re-counted lately) and over 700 reviews at www.HistoricalNovels.info
- robinbird79
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 378
- Joined: June 2009
- Location: Georgia
OK, bumping the thread for another round of questions. I know astrology's been around for a year or two, but would it have been openly practiced, discussed and fortunes told in the court of Richard II without fear of censure from the church?
At home with a good book and the cat...
...is the only place I want to be
...is the only place I want to be
- MLE (Emily Cotton)
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3566
- Joined: August 2008
- Interest in HF: started in childhood with the classics, which, IMHO are HF even if they were contemporary when written.
- Favourite HF book: Prince of Foxes, by Samuel Shellabarger
- Preferred HF: Currently prefer 1600 and earlier, but I'll read anything that keeps me turning the page.
- Location: California Bay Area
[quote=""Misfit""]OK, bumping the thread for another round of questions. I know astrology's been around for a year or two, but would it have been openly practiced, discussed and fortunes told in the court of Richard II without fear of censure from the church?[/quote]
Yes, it would have. As anybody studying Medieval Christianity can see, the parts of scripture that were 'in' were overpracticed, and the parts that were 'out' simply ignored. Astrology was 'in'. Witchcraft was 'out'.
Astrology was considered a science -- hence the 'ology' -- 'study of' after the astro part. When Galileo's telescope actually began the infant science of studying the stars, they had to call it 'star-naming', or astronomy, because 'star-study' was already taken and had a distinctly non-scientific meaning.
Every royal court had its official astrologer, and most of the great households did too. That's true all across Europe, in the Muslim-controlled nations, and China.
Yes, it would have. As anybody studying Medieval Christianity can see, the parts of scripture that were 'in' were overpracticed, and the parts that were 'out' simply ignored. Astrology was 'in'. Witchcraft was 'out'.
Astrology was considered a science -- hence the 'ology' -- 'study of' after the astro part. When Galileo's telescope actually began the infant science of studying the stars, they had to call it 'star-naming', or astronomy, because 'star-study' was already taken and had a distinctly non-scientific meaning.
Every royal court had its official astrologer, and most of the great households did too. That's true all across Europe, in the Muslim-controlled nations, and China.
- boswellbaxter
- Bibliomaniac
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: August 2008
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
[quote=""Misfit""]OK, bumping the thread for another round of questions. I know astrology's been around for a year or two, but would it have been openly practiced, discussed and fortunes told in the court of Richard II without fear of censure from the church?[/quote]
Yes. Richard II's biographer Nigel Saul notes that he "appears to have paid a considerable amount of attention to astrological predictions," and that his mother commissioned a set of astrological tables. Saul goes on to note that there was evidently "a ready market for [astrological] literature among the well-to-do clergy and the aristocracy."
Yes. Richard II's biographer Nigel Saul notes that he "appears to have paid a considerable amount of attention to astrological predictions," and that his mother commissioned a set of astrological tables. Saul goes on to note that there was evidently "a ready market for [astrological] literature among the well-to-do clergy and the aristocracy."
Susan Higginbotham
Coming in October: The Woodvilles
http://www.susanhigginbotham.com/
http://www.susanhigginbotham.com/blog/
Coming in October: The Woodvilles
http://www.susanhigginbotham.com/
http://www.susanhigginbotham.com/blog/
Thanks ladies, that helps a lot. Now if I could find a reason for our hero to tell the King he's not going to wed the lady he's told too unless she can prove she loves him...
At home with a good book and the cat...
...is the only place I want to be
...is the only place I want to be
- Alisha Marie Klapheke
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 376
- Joined: November 2010
- Location: Franklin, TN
- Contact:
LOL on the pink dead bunnies and Duke/King/Master of the Universe comments.
Aside from that, this all makes me nervous about my first attempt at HF. I knew the answers to the less detailed of the questions originally posted on this thread, I've completed years of research using original and qualified secondary sources, and I feel like I'm comfortable in the time period of my novel (mid 13thc), but I'm afraid. I don't want a bunch of fantastic folks like you guys poking fun at my work on websites! Ack!
Is this why writers who do not have medieval history degrees get professional readers? Is that something I could do without having to spend money I do not have (I am a poor teacher)? How difficult is it to find someone who knows about my time period and who is willing to read my MS and point out any problems with the history side of things?
Aside from that, this all makes me nervous about my first attempt at HF. I knew the answers to the less detailed of the questions originally posted on this thread, I've completed years of research using original and qualified secondary sources, and I feel like I'm comfortable in the time period of my novel (mid 13thc), but I'm afraid. I don't want a bunch of fantastic folks like you guys poking fun at my work on websites! Ack!
Is this why writers who do not have medieval history degrees get professional readers? Is that something I could do without having to spend money I do not have (I am a poor teacher)? How difficult is it to find someone who knows about my time period and who is willing to read my MS and point out any problems with the history side of things?
- SarahWoodbury
- Avid Reader
- Posts: 496
- Joined: March 2009
- Location: Pendleton, Oregon
- Contact:
Honestly, I would just do your best and accept what comes. New research comes out all the time and that's what the 'fiction' in historical fiction is all about. Yes, there are things that drive people crazy, but what bothers one won't bother another. If you serve potatoes in England in the 13th century, that would be a problem, but just do your best and don't worry about it.
That said, do you have a writing partner? Someone who shares your love of history? I don't think you need an 'expert'--just someone who might flag certain issues that you might not know are issues and send you in the direction of getting better answers. We are all constantly learning new things. Sometimes you learn something in time to put in the book and sometimes you don't . . .
That said, do you have a writing partner? Someone who shares your love of history? I don't think you need an 'expert'--just someone who might flag certain issues that you might not know are issues and send you in the direction of getting better answers. We are all constantly learning new things. Sometimes you learn something in time to put in the book and sometimes you don't . . .