View Full Version : Who really built the pyramids??
Reading The Heretic Queen has me wondering if Historians are agreed upon who really built the pyramids. I know pop culture holds that it was Jewish slaves but THQ suggests that Jews served in Pharoah's army, forcibly but they were paid same as all the soldiers. Then I saw on The History Channel that rather than the cruel slave/taskmaster scenario Egyptians actually had a complicated heirarchy of laborers and overseeers with health care, workers rights, etc. Is that an accepted thing in historical circles or is it a pretty new hypothesis?
Also, what about the whole "Exodus" thing? Can that be backed up with fact or is what we think we know about entirely from Christian and Jewish religious texts?
Volgadon
09-26-2008, 04:31 PM
As far as I'm aware of, the only source for the Exodus story is the Pentateuch.
When it comes to pyramids, nowhere in the Bible does it say that they were constructed by the Israelites! Two cities by the name of Pithom and Rameses, yes, but not a word about pyraimds.
Alaric
09-26-2008, 04:51 PM
They were probably built by slave labour of a number of ethnicities, it seems unlikely that there would only be one group of people who built the whole thing. When it comes to think like this and Stonehenge usually the most obvious answer is the probably the correct one. :p
Abraham wasn't even around when the first pyramids were built. Cheops pyramid (the largest of the 3 at Gizeh) dates around 3,000 BC. The Egyptians first started with smaller step-style pyramids, then there were the three big conical ones. By the time the Hebrews were enslaved (no, not during Rameses II, they have found his tomb, no Israelite mention there, and archaeological digs in Israel have turned up Ramses II artifacts during the period of Judges, the 300 years after the exodus) during the reign of Thutmose I, the burial fashion was tombs cut into the rock.
Research and archaeology keeps bringing new things to light, but most probably the pharaoh of the exodus was Amenhotep II, Ahkenaten's grandfather. The chronology of the Exodus account also fits perfectly into what is known of Hatshepsut for being the 'pharaoh's daughter' who fished Moses out of the Nile and fostered him. She held power for 40 years. Guess how old Moses was when he had to flee Egypt? Then her son-in-law Thutmose III held power for 40 more years. Guess how old Moses was when he came back 'after the pharaoh who sought to kill him was dead?'
As to who built the pyramids, I doubt it was slave labor at all. It was much more likely to have been a religious duty, one which would gain merit for the laborer in the afterlife. The Nile valley, with its seasonal abundance, provided enough food and a pattern of leisure to allow the general population to participate in activities like pyramid construction. In other words, working on pyramids gave the Egyptians something meaningful to do during their down-time.
donroc
09-26-2008, 06:42 PM
Immnuel Velikovsky in his Worlds in Collision has an interesting theory about the "science" behind the Exodus, who was Pharoah, and the natural causes of the 10 plagues and parting of the sea of Reeds.
Also read his Oedipus and Akhnaton regarding his radical, academia distressing revised timeline of Egyptian history.
A web site devoted to his writings is The Immanuel Velikovsky Archive
Finally, as an aside, also read Sigmund Freud's Moses and Montheism, his final book, in which he postulates Moses was an Egyptian.
Margaret
09-26-2008, 06:52 PM
Fascinating post, MLE. If the captivity of the Israelites was during the time of Akhenaten's grandfather, it would seem very likely that his turn to monotheism was at least in part influenced by stories about the Israelites' beliefs. This is a totally new idea for me, and I'm surprised it hasn't been used in at least a few novels (maybe it has been, but I just haven't read them). The Hatshepsut/Moses theory is an interesting one, too. If all of this indeed fits together, it would be interesting that the two most reviled Pharaohs of their times were also the two who were most friendly to the Israelites and/or their ideas!
I used to have a subscription to an archaeology magazine that went over all the new discoveries in that area. It was always fascinating to see how things were developing, new theories coming up and old ones scrapped as various things were dug up. A very inexact science, but lots of fun!
Hatshepsut has always been a favorite of mine. Her 'reign' is a little confusing, since she ran things during the official reigns of her father, husband, and son-in-law (Thutmoses I, II, and III) and the record of her activities is so well-preserved because Thut III plastered over the inscriptions on monuments she made and had his own stuff put there.
If you want to take the biblical story at face value (or some variation thereof) it is interesting to note that Thutmose III was quite a conqueror, made it all the way up into Assyria and down into Libya, but his huge standing army was never mentioned after his death and his successor (not the original heir, by his recorded story) apparently sat at home and lost all the territories Dad had conquered.
Another item that came up in that magazine was the satellite pictures where they can trace roads buried in the sand and old caravan routes. This imaging technique has been used to bolster the theory that the current Mount Sinai isn't the right one, but some mountain (name forgotten) in Saudi Arabia, where a large group of people apparently made tracks for a couple generations.
Spitfire
09-27-2008, 02:26 AM
You know, I always assumed that the Isrealites built the pyramids while they were in captivity in Egypt. But that is a good point, since the Pyramids were obviously built well before that time period, that could not have been the case. Wether it was slave labour or religious duty, I can imagine it would have taken thousands of laborours over many years to complete that project!
princess garnet
09-27-2008, 01:49 PM
The movie "The Ten Commandments" has the Israelites working on a large building project, not a pryamid though!
donroc
09-27-2008, 02:36 PM
Freud postulated that Moses was an Egyptian, likely a follower of Akhnaton's religion, and the Exodus took place during the upheaveal that followed the Pharoah's death.
Velikovsky rejected Ramses II as the pharoah of the Exodus because, in part, in his view he was too autocratic and powerful to allow so great a migration from his kingdom -- and the great catastrophies took place during a different reign.
All very interesting and controversial, to say the least.
Freud postulated that Moses was an Egyptian, likely a follower of Akhnaton's religion, and the Exodus took place during the upheaveal that followed the Pharoah's death.
Velikovsky rejected Ramses II as the pharoah of the Exodus because, in part, in his view he was too autocratic and powerful to allow so great a migration from his kingdom -- and the great catastrophies took place during a different reign.
All very interesting and controversial, to say the least.
But all of those theories were before they discovered the tomb of Rameses II -- a bus driver found it, he noticed that there was a place under the parking lot for the tourist attraction that 'felt hollow' when he drove over it. That was in the eighties, I believe.
Actually, monotheism isn't such a strange idea that it has to be traced to one central thinker. Almost all cultures have at least one thread of monotheistic belief among the many that their philosophers consider.
But Freud was so into connecting things that probably had nothing to do with each other, I wouldn't be surprised if he postulated that the Native American belief in the 'Great Spirit' came from their contact with Irish Monks, who rowed there to get away from all women because of an unspoken Oedipus complex born out of their desire to compete with their father's sexual prowess.
donroc
09-27-2008, 05:34 PM
Freud's most basic point in M&M is that the story of Moses turns the hero myth upside down. The hero is supposed to be born into the royal family, cast out to die because of a prophecy, then discovers his true origins and so on.
According to scripture, Moses is born to a slave family, raised by the royals, and returns to his "people".
Freud decided scripture had to be wrong.
Velikovsky attacked Freud's Moses theory in Oedpus and Akhnaton.
I will not go into Velikovsky's radical change of Egyptian and Greek chronology. That is for another thread.
Volgadon
09-27-2008, 07:20 PM
I used to have a subscription to an archaeology magazine that went over all the new discoveries in that area. It was always fascinating to see how things were developing, new theories coming up and old ones scrapped as various things were dug up. A very inexact science, but lots of fun! .
Not BAR by any chance?
Not BAR by any chance?
Yep, that's the one.
Volgadon
09-27-2008, 08:52 PM
Great mag. The letters to the editor are priceless.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.